WHAT DOES YOUR TITLE SAY ABOUT YOU?

Question: My husband and I hold title to our home as husband and wife as community property. Does that mean if he dies, I will automatically own that property?

Answer: The answer is not always an absolute “yes” to this question.

There are various ways people can hold title to assets. Often, how people hold title on their property, such as real estate and bank accounts, may be the only estate planning they have done. Unfortunately, it may NOT always be what their estate planning wishes are. Additionally, if people have done a trust and/or a will, how they hold title to some of their assets may completely conflict and sometime even override what their trust or will provides.

For example, let’s say you and your husband bought your home last year and took title as “husband and wife, as community property”. It was your mutual intent that when one of you dies, the other will own the home 100% and without any court involvement. Now, if you and your husband have no will or trust or if your will or trust provides that all your community property shall pass to the surviving spouse, then the answer to the question would be “yes”.

But now let’s say your husband has a will which provides that upon his death, all of his estate (this includes his separate property and his 50% interest in the community property) is to be shared equally between you and his two children from his first marriage. In this scenario, when your husband dies, you would NOT inherit his entire share of the home, but would have to split it (along with the rest of his estate) with his two children. The reason is that in 2001, California adopted a new form of title “community property with right of survivorship”. This is different than the form of title “community property”. When someone holds title as “community property” it provides a person the ability to bequeath their ownership interest in their community property assets to someone other than a surviving spouse through wills or trust. When you hold title as “community property with right of survivorship”, you cannot. The surviving spouse becomes the sole surviving owner of all community property under this form of title, regardless of what wills or trusts may provide. This is similar to joint tenancy where the surviving joint tenant becomes sole owner upon death.

So what does the form of title say about you and your estate plan? To find out more and call 925-516-1617 to schedule a consultation at ALVIS FRANTZ AND ASSOCIATES, where your legal challenges just got easier!

Disclaimer: The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.

This information on this site is designed to provide a general overview with regard to the subject matter covered and may not be state specific. The authors, publisher and host are not providing legal, accounting, tax or other specific advice to your situation.

Copyright © 2011 Alvis Frantz and Associates.

4 Tips to Reduce the Potential for Will and Trust Disputes:

Advise your beneficiaries of your distribution plans, especially when children are being treated unequally. Will contests and litigation arise from disappointed feelings of entitlement. Telling the children ahead of time what their shares will be may avoid a later dispute. (Although it could cause family problems now though so be careful. Sometime writing a “family love letter” to your children to be read after your death, explaining why you set up the distribution plan the way you did may help as well. This will vary from family to family.

Use a Trust - not just a Will. Since trusts can be funded and operate during lifetime, it is difficult to contest on the grounds that the individual was unaware of its terms. When the Trustor of the trust dies, there is no need to begin a court proceeding to "prove" the validity of the trust, like there is for a will.

Use Disinheritance Or No Contest Clause.  The goal here is to prevent beneficiaries from causing a legal dispute after someone dies. A lot of trust and estate litigation is not about the validity of the document, but about how it is to be interpreted or how it is being managed. In order to reduce this type of litigation, a disinheritance clause can cause a forfeiture of a beneficiary's interest if such a challenge is made. The entire estate plan must be consistent with this clause.

Use Mediation or Arbitration Provisions in your plan. Arbitration or mediation cannot be used with respect to the challenge of a document's validity unless the parties agree to it. Using a disinheritance clause to cause forfeiture if the parties will not participate can be used. This could stop claims that are filed only to harass other beneficiaries or to delay distributions to others. Another approach would be having the parties enter into a contract agreeing to arbitration before the transfer.

Disclaimer: The information provided is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to your particular issue or problem. Use of this information or any related information does not create an attorney-client relationship between ALVIS FRANTZ AND ASSOCIATES. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual authors and does not reflect the opinions of any firm or attorney.

THE FUTURE OF THE ESTATE TAX EXEMPTION

I just finished reading a a Wall Street Journal article by Laura Saunders on the issue of what will happen to the Estate Tax next year the and consequences thereof. The current Federal Estate Tax exemption ($3.5 million) is set to "disappear" next year. (The current law is expiring). Most people would say "Great! So it doesn't matter how much I own, if I die next year there will be no estate tax due for my kids." Unfortunately, there may be much bigger problems to consider.

The current estate tax law was enacted by Congress back in 2000. It increaed every year and it is currently at $3.5 million per person ($7 million per couple). In otherwords, if you and your spouse own $7 million in assets and died in 2009, you can pass all the assets to your heirs and they wont owe any estate tax - which is at 45%.

Under the current law, the will be no federal estate tax at all for 2010 and in 2011 it will follow the current lifetime gift tax exemption of $1 million per individual ($2 million for a couple). In the above situation, if the above couple died in 2011 with an estate of $7 million, $5 million would be taxed - if the rates stays at 45% - then the heirs would owe $2.25 million on their inheritance.

It is believed among most in the industry that Congress will step in very soon and extend the current exemption because of the collateral tax damage this "lapse" can cause. It is really an issue of what is called a "step-up in cost basis". This means that when someone inherits an asset, the value of that asset is "stepped up" to the current value at the time of inheritance (date of death). Without a "step-up", the asset would retain the original value from when the original owner acquired it. If the estate tax goes away, so will this "step-up in cost basis".

Here's an example:

Let's say your mother leaves your son a stock that she bought in 1970. She paid $5 for the stock but tody it is valued at $75. Under the current tax law, if mom died today, when your son inherits the stock, the value is $75. So if next year your son sells the stock and it sells for $80, he will only have to pay capital gains tax on the $5 profit. Without the "step up", the original cost of $5 for the stock would transfer to your son (called a "carry-over basis"), so when he sold the stock at $80, he would now have to pay capital gains tax on $75 profit. Now if you apply that same principal to something larger, like a home purchased for $50k in 1970 and is valued at $750k today, it is clear how much of a tax burden this will place on your son. This is also why gifting an asset versus allowing it to pass through inheritance is not always the best option.

There are many possible solutions being proposed in congress right now. Something may be passed by the end of the year, something may happen later and be applied retroactively, it is definately an area to be aware of and if you haven't developed your estate plan, yet, it is definately a time to get things done and protect your estate not only from probate, but also to attempt to minimize the tax burdens on your heirs while we still have the ability to do so.

Disclaimer: The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.


Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication, including attachments, was not written to be used and cannot be used for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein. If you would like a written opinion upon which you can rely for the purposes of avoiding penalties, please contact us.