WHAT DOES YOUR TITLE SAY ABOUT YOU?

Question: My husband and I hold title to our home as husband and wife as community property. Does that mean if he dies, I will automatically own that property?

Answer: The answer is not always an absolute “yes” to this question.

There are various ways people can hold title to assets. Often, how people hold title on their property, such as real estate and bank accounts, may be the only estate planning they have done. Unfortunately, it may NOT always be what their estate planning wishes are. Additionally, if people have done a trust and/or a will, how they hold title to some of their assets may completely conflict and sometime even override what their trust or will provides.

For example, let’s say you and your husband bought your home last year and took title as “husband and wife, as community property”. It was your mutual intent that when one of you dies, the other will own the home 100% and without any court involvement. Now, if you and your husband have no will or trust or if your will or trust provides that all your community property shall pass to the surviving spouse, then the answer to the question would be “yes”.

But now let’s say your husband has a will which provides that upon his death, all of his estate (this includes his separate property and his 50% interest in the community property) is to be shared equally between you and his two children from his first marriage. In this scenario, when your husband dies, you would NOT inherit his entire share of the home, but would have to split it (along with the rest of his estate) with his two children. The reason is that in 2001, California adopted a new form of title “community property with right of survivorship”. This is different than the form of title “community property”. When someone holds title as “community property” it provides a person the ability to bequeath their ownership interest in their community property assets to someone other than a surviving spouse through wills or trust. When you hold title as “community property with right of survivorship”, you cannot. The surviving spouse becomes the sole surviving owner of all community property under this form of title, regardless of what wills or trusts may provide. This is similar to joint tenancy where the surviving joint tenant becomes sole owner upon death.

So what does the form of title say about you and your estate plan? To find out more and call 925-516-1617 to schedule a consultation at ALVIS FRANTZ AND ASSOCIATES, where your legal challenges just got easier!

Disclaimer: The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.

This information on this site is designed to provide a general overview with regard to the subject matter covered and may not be state specific. The authors, publisher and host are not providing legal, accounting, tax or other specific advice to your situation.

Copyright © 2011 Alvis Frantz and Associates.

What are you waiting for?

When I meet with a client for the first times, one of the very first questions I ask them is why they wanted to meet with me and why are they coming in for estate planning now.  I constantly hear people tell me they have been putting it off and putting it off and putting it off.  But what is it that finally brings them in.  It's typically one of four reasons:


• Travel.
• Hospitalization or terminal medical diagnosis
• Change in family status (marriage, divorce, death, birth of a child)
Many of the reasons that cause people to stop procrastinating and get things in order is when they are forced to face their own mortality.  For many, once we begin to come to terms with the inevitable, we begin taking those steps to prepare and protect our loved ones. 

Without some "push" we can easily find an excuse to put this on the "to do" list but never get it done.  Here are some common excuses:

• I/We don't have time
• I/We can't get all the paperwork together
• I/We don't have the money
• I/We need help from a family member and that person is just too busy
• I/We don't have much and therefore don't need anything
• Don't know anyone who I would want to have raise my kids if something happens to us
• Don't have the money, and for many superstitious people....
• If we do it (write a will, buy life insurance, etc.) something bad will happen to us

What I always find though is that once people do get it done, they always feel so much more secure and confident.  The answer to many of these questions lies in one of a few answers....

• Time:  It may take a few hours now, but it will take your loved one years later if you don't
• A small investment now will same your estates tens of thousands later
• Everyone need some planning - unless you want someone else to make your decisions for you.... like the State and a Judge.
• If you don't pick someone to raise your children if you can't, the State and a Judge will decide for you.
• If you do it or don't do it.... we are all going to die someday.  Being prepared will only make it easier for your loved ones to grieve since there will be a lot less hassle.

If you can't focus on estate planning right now, set a timeline.  Don't wait until you are rushed, scarred or after it's too late.  Create a savings plan for it if money is your issue (don't skimp though... you get what you pay for).  The next time something gives you that big "push", jump on it, call us, I am sure you will feel so much better when it's done. 

4 Tips to Reduce the Potential for Will and Trust Disputes:

Advise your beneficiaries of your distribution plans, especially when children are being treated unequally. Will contests and litigation arise from disappointed feelings of entitlement. Telling the children ahead of time what their shares will be may avoid a later dispute. (Although it could cause family problems now though so be careful. Sometime writing a “family love letter” to your children to be read after your death, explaining why you set up the distribution plan the way you did may help as well. This will vary from family to family.

Use a Trust - not just a Will. Since trusts can be funded and operate during lifetime, it is difficult to contest on the grounds that the individual was unaware of its terms. When the Trustor of the trust dies, there is no need to begin a court proceeding to "prove" the validity of the trust, like there is for a will.

Use Disinheritance Or No Contest Clause.  The goal here is to prevent beneficiaries from causing a legal dispute after someone dies. A lot of trust and estate litigation is not about the validity of the document, but about how it is to be interpreted or how it is being managed. In order to reduce this type of litigation, a disinheritance clause can cause a forfeiture of a beneficiary's interest if such a challenge is made. The entire estate plan must be consistent with this clause.

Use Mediation or Arbitration Provisions in your plan. Arbitration or mediation cannot be used with respect to the challenge of a document's validity unless the parties agree to it. Using a disinheritance clause to cause forfeiture if the parties will not participate can be used. This could stop claims that are filed only to harass other beneficiaries or to delay distributions to others. Another approach would be having the parties enter into a contract agreeing to arbitration before the transfer.

Disclaimer: The information provided is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to your particular issue or problem. Use of this information or any related information does not create an attorney-client relationship between ALVIS FRANTZ AND ASSOCIATES. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual authors and does not reflect the opinions of any firm or attorney.

A Gift Isn't Always A Gift

If you as a parent give a substantial amount of money to one of your children, it is important for the parents to decide how they want to treat that money.  First, if you decide it is a loan, it is important to have a proper promissory note drawn up and terms of payment.  It is also important to determine what will happen if the loan is not repaid.  For example, do you want the loan to be forgiven if you die, or should the unpaid balance be deducted from that child's inheritance.

But what if you decide to treat the amount as a gift.  If you have more than one child, it is very important to understand and document how you want to address this gift.   If the other siblings discover a gift  was made to one of them but not all of them, it could create some resentment or fighting after both of the parents have  passed away.

When making a gift to a child, you need to decide if this is an outright gift with no bearing on future inheritance, or rather, do you want the gift to be considered an "advance" of future inheritance.  In this case, the gifted amount would be deducted from that child's share of their inheritance at the time they are to receive their inheritance.

So in simple terms,  if you chose to treat the amount given as a "gift", you will need to do one of the following (depending on your wishes):
1) Intend to provide disproportionate amounts to your children through gift and inheritance
2) Gift equalizing amounts to all siblings (be sure to understand any tax implication of your gifting)
3) Consider the gift an advance on inheritance.

Whichever option you choose, you should be sure to document, document, document - either with an update to your will and/or trust, in other writing, or through documented action.  If you don't, there will most likely be a a great deal of fighting and frustration among your children after you have passed away.

Disclaimer: The information provided is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to your particular issue or problem. Use of this information or any related information does not create an attorney-client relationship. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual authors and does not reflect the opinions of any firm or attorney.

Now What.... Estate Tax in Limbo

Okay, so it seems like there's a big hiccup in the proposed extention of the estate tax law. Basically congress failed to finalize any changes in that tax law. It is expected that they will resume after the holidays but until then, we are all in planning limbo.

What is also at issue is if/when they do enact a new tax law, will it be applied retroactively. The court have upheld a retroactive application of income tax laws, but the issues as it pertains to estate tax has not yet been faced.

Here's the rub: See, typical tax issues are "regulations" and not "statutes". They are handled differently. Courts can can "interpret" statutes to tell us how they apply. On the otherhand, the IRS can simply issue a formal "Notice" explaining that the tax consequences of a certain type of transaction that is under review and then later apply a "regulation" to apply.

Now with respect to the Federal Estate Tax issue, it is NOT a "regulation", but rather an actual "statute" so some elected officials see it as importants (like a statute) where others are much more casual about it like they are with "regulations".

For example, on December 4th, the House of Representatives passed an Estate Tax Bill which provides that the current law would remain in effect. The House did not including it in any bills to be passed by the senate by the end of the year. (Senate is busy with health care, go figure)

So, maybe people think no estate tax is a great thing if you die in 2010. The grass is not always greener though and kids, don't think that this is the perfect opportunity to wait until Jan 1 to pull the plug on the heart and lung machine.

As it stands today, we are back where we started.... no estate tax for 2010 and in 2011 it will revert back to the old rate of 55% for estates over $1 mill (all the more reason to rejoice in this horrible houseing market, no?)

For two more days at least, married couples (with proper trust planning) can shelter up to $7 million ($3.5 million for individuals). Anything over that is subject to 45% estate tax. So when heirs sell inherited property, little or no capital gains tax is due on the increase in value that occurred during the lifetime of the original owner because the inherited asset is "stepped-up" in value based on the value at the date of death.

So what does this mean if there is a new estate tax law passed later in 2010 and it is applied retroactively. Say mom and dad pass in January, you file to estate tax return, but then the law is enacted in June, now you have to go back and refile and pay taxes. What if all the money has since been dispersed, invested, spents, etc. The trustee alone may be personally liable to pay for any owed estate taxes.

So it may be a good time to plan properly to protect your heirs during this time of tax limbo.

Chosing Guardians

During one of my recent client consultations we discussed the difficulty for them to chose their guardian(s) for their children. Whether or not to include a spouse, who should be alternates, what if one of the couples chosen get's divorced, etc. Choosing guardians is probably the hardest decision for parents to make in the estate planning process.

In my research about a way to help "simplify" this process for my clients, I found a great article written by an attorney in Thousand Oaks, CA. I don't want to improperly reproduce her article without her permission, but I would like to recap some of her wise and helpful ideas.

First, she wanted to remind parents that when naming guardians, we are not just choosing who will take care of your children when you die, but who will take care of your children if you become incapacitated or incompetent.

It was noted that parents should really provide as much detail as they desire about not just who will raise their children, but how. Basically what this will allow for example, is if college education is very important to you then you can express that the guardians strive to ensure that your children go to college. If your family religion is very important to you, you can express that your child continue to be exposed to and participate in their religion. You can be as detailed as you want to ensure that your children continue to be raised with the same morals and values you would instill in them if you were still there to raise them.

She went out to list out four basic steps for parents to chose a guardian.

The first step was to "Make a List"

It was recommended that the list be long, including anyone who you think might be a good guardian. This would mean, people you would chose over the foster system basically. In doing this, also list those you would absolutely NEVER want to raise your children. You can specifically exclude someone if you want. If you are having trouble making a long list, be sure to come up with at least 3-4 though. This list can include family members, friends, colleagues, etc. especially if they have similar values to you. Remember, the person(s) who takes over as guardian for your children does NOT need to be the same person who acts as trustee over their money, so don't limit your list because of financial considerations.

The article also discussed the difference between Temporary & Permanent Guardians and your ability to chose both if that feels better for you.

Temporary guardians are basically for a certain defined time period. They may be appointed to care for your children if you become temporarily disabled or even for a short time to finish the school year out before having to move to a new city, state or country even.

Permanent guardians would be the ones to care for your children until the age of majority when you pass away. (You don't need to have separate Temporary and Permanent Guardians named, but in some situations, you may feel it would be best)

A new concept she discussed was a "Guardianship Panel" which is basically a collection of people you name (friends, family, maybe even a doctor) who will decide who would be the best caretaker for your children. Personally, I don't think this is the best "first" option as it can lead to a lot of disagreements. I think as a last resort if all named guardians are not able to serve or chose not to serve, it might be okay.

The second step was to write down "What Matters Most". Factors she states to consider about a prospective guardian are:

• maturity
• patience
• stamina
• age
• child-rearing philosophy
• presence of children in the home already
• interest in and relationship with your children
• stability
• ability to meet the physical demands of child care
• presence of enough "free" time to raise children
• religion or spirituality
• integrity pets
• potential conflicts of interest with your children
• willingness to serve
• social and moral habits and values
• marital or family status
• willingness to adopt your children

I would write these in order of importance, then see how each potential guardian measures up.

Once again, don't let money issues guide you. For example, let's say you have been a stay-at-home mom and want to be certain your children continue to haven a parent at home full time if you should die. But what if your top choice for a guardian works full-time and her children are in day care? What you can do is properly prepare financially with life insurance and investments to be able to provide adequate financial support so that the guardian you want to raise your children is able to stay at home and raise your children.

The third step was to "Match People to Priorities"

After you measured everyone up based on the above factors, narrow your list down to 3-4. Rank those in order, and there you go!

Now that you have your list, as I would ask my clients, ask yourself: what if that couple you name first should get divorced, what if one of them dies? Are you willing for either of the two to raise them on their own, or would you rather move down the list to your next choice of guardian? In some cases, it may be best to only name one person than that person and their spouse.

The final/fourth step "Make it Positive"

This will be an opportunity for parents to really share their thoughts, hopes, and fears with each other. Hopefully the two of you can grow from the process. Remember as well, when you make your wishes know, and detail them out, and share them with your intended guardians for your children:

• The relationship between all parties may increase
• As parents, you have a mutually focused idea of what you want for your children and can share this with your named guardians.
• You will know what you want to achieve with your children while you are still there for them.

So once it is all said and done, you will have "secured your peace of mind" and will rest easier at night knowing your children will be cared for according to YOUR wishes, whatever may come your way.


Disclaimer: The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.

I'll DO IT TOMORROW

Don't we all just love thinking about making our legal plans and thinking about our own mortality? I mean, really, there is just nothing more exciting, right? Okay really, we'd much rather spend our time watching water boil than think about who will take care of our kids if we should die or who will be the one to tell the doctor to pull the plug if all hope is lost.

Did you know that it is estimated that only about 1/3 of all adult Americans have actually taking the time to prepare the life and estate plans? So what about the other 2/3 of the population? Are they just simply irresponsible. Not likely. So maybe it is just a matter of procrastination. I mean, if we're young, healthy, etc, thinking about our death seems years away.

So what causes people to procrastinate with this very important task people must handle.
It really is normal behavior to avoid things that are unpleasant. How many look forward to doing our taxes... even if we know we will get a refund... it is just the "hassle" of gathering all the paperwork. We all know that death is unavoidable and that we should get our affairs in order to prepare for it and to ensure our families are protected. But since most adults under the age of 60 do no see their death as being in the near future, they don't see the urgency to plan now.

I mean, people are living longer these days so even if you live to a ripe old age, however, the downside is that, the longer you live, the greater your chances of wearing out physically and mentally before you pass on. Have you visited a nursing home lately?

So part of the "unpleasant-ness" of estate planning is people's age (or lack of old age for some), for some it may be the "hassle" of paperwork, for others it may be avoiding interpersonal relationships. For example, maybe you are not on good terms with family members and therefore, deciding who will take care of your children and/or who should inherit your assets, is some you have no idea what to do about. Whatever the reason, is really is just another excuse.

Excuses, Excuses - we all have them and I am sure we all can justify and rationalize a "reason" why we procrastinate on something. It is an amazing talent we, as humans, have mastered to a tee.

Take these rational excuses as examples to why someone has not set up their estate plan yet:

"We don’t have time, because we are getting ready to do some traveling."

Ironically, most people spend more time packing their luggage, than they do making proper estate plans. And in the the worse case scenario... what if something happens during the flight?

"My son can’t get away from work to come with me for an initial consultation."

Well, if you wait until you are incapacitated or dead, your son can take off work to sort through your assets, squabble with his siblings, hire an attorney and develop an almost first-name relationship with the probate judge.

"Since my children all get along, there’s no need to bother with any planning."

That may be true, but will they know your specific wishes for your home, your bank accounts and your investments, not to mention your heirlooms like the kind over which you and your siblings fought after your parents died.

"We don’t have an estate tax problem." or "Why, my business has no value without me."

Perhaps, but the IRS may not agree with you, especially given your inventory, equipment, real estate, loyal customer base and goodwill.

"It’s too expensive."

You have spent a lifetime working hard to build your estate. A small investment now will save potentially tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars in unnecessary probate costs and taxes. What price tag can you put on that kind of peace of mind?

SO WHAT ARE YOU STILL WAITING FOR?

Don't we all know someone or a friend of someone who has gone through the devastating emotional and financial hardship when a loved one has passed away without proper planning. Wouldn't you sleep better at night knowing you wont have to place your family in that predicament when you overcome your estate planning procrastination.

Schedule an estate planning consultation today... it's free... so what are you still waiting for? Call 925-301-7195 or visit www.LivingTrustsbyAmy.com for more information.