Now What.... Estate Tax in Limbo

Okay, so it seems like there's a big hiccup in the proposed extention of the estate tax law. Basically congress failed to finalize any changes in that tax law. It is expected that they will resume after the holidays but until then, we are all in planning limbo.

What is also at issue is if/when they do enact a new tax law, will it be applied retroactively. The court have upheld a retroactive application of income tax laws, but the issues as it pertains to estate tax has not yet been faced.

Here's the rub: See, typical tax issues are "regulations" and not "statutes". They are handled differently. Courts can can "interpret" statutes to tell us how they apply. On the otherhand, the IRS can simply issue a formal "Notice" explaining that the tax consequences of a certain type of transaction that is under review and then later apply a "regulation" to apply.

Now with respect to the Federal Estate Tax issue, it is NOT a "regulation", but rather an actual "statute" so some elected officials see it as importants (like a statute) where others are much more casual about it like they are with "regulations".

For example, on December 4th, the House of Representatives passed an Estate Tax Bill which provides that the current law would remain in effect. The House did not including it in any bills to be passed by the senate by the end of the year. (Senate is busy with health care, go figure)

So, maybe people think no estate tax is a great thing if you die in 2010. The grass is not always greener though and kids, don't think that this is the perfect opportunity to wait until Jan 1 to pull the plug on the heart and lung machine.

As it stands today, we are back where we started.... no estate tax for 2010 and in 2011 it will revert back to the old rate of 55% for estates over $1 mill (all the more reason to rejoice in this horrible houseing market, no?)

For two more days at least, married couples (with proper trust planning) can shelter up to $7 million ($3.5 million for individuals). Anything over that is subject to 45% estate tax. So when heirs sell inherited property, little or no capital gains tax is due on the increase in value that occurred during the lifetime of the original owner because the inherited asset is "stepped-up" in value based on the value at the date of death.

So what does this mean if there is a new estate tax law passed later in 2010 and it is applied retroactively. Say mom and dad pass in January, you file to estate tax return, but then the law is enacted in June, now you have to go back and refile and pay taxes. What if all the money has since been dispersed, invested, spents, etc. The trustee alone may be personally liable to pay for any owed estate taxes.

So it may be a good time to plan properly to protect your heirs during this time of tax limbo.

THE FUTURE OF THE ESTATE TAX EXEMPTION

I just finished reading a a Wall Street Journal article by Laura Saunders on the issue of what will happen to the Estate Tax next year the and consequences thereof. The current Federal Estate Tax exemption ($3.5 million) is set to "disappear" next year. (The current law is expiring). Most people would say "Great! So it doesn't matter how much I own, if I die next year there will be no estate tax due for my kids." Unfortunately, there may be much bigger problems to consider.

The current estate tax law was enacted by Congress back in 2000. It increaed every year and it is currently at $3.5 million per person ($7 million per couple). In otherwords, if you and your spouse own $7 million in assets and died in 2009, you can pass all the assets to your heirs and they wont owe any estate tax - which is at 45%.

Under the current law, the will be no federal estate tax at all for 2010 and in 2011 it will follow the current lifetime gift tax exemption of $1 million per individual ($2 million for a couple). In the above situation, if the above couple died in 2011 with an estate of $7 million, $5 million would be taxed - if the rates stays at 45% - then the heirs would owe $2.25 million on their inheritance.

It is believed among most in the industry that Congress will step in very soon and extend the current exemption because of the collateral tax damage this "lapse" can cause. It is really an issue of what is called a "step-up in cost basis". This means that when someone inherits an asset, the value of that asset is "stepped up" to the current value at the time of inheritance (date of death). Without a "step-up", the asset would retain the original value from when the original owner acquired it. If the estate tax goes away, so will this "step-up in cost basis".

Here's an example:

Let's say your mother leaves your son a stock that she bought in 1970. She paid $5 for the stock but tody it is valued at $75. Under the current tax law, if mom died today, when your son inherits the stock, the value is $75. So if next year your son sells the stock and it sells for $80, he will only have to pay capital gains tax on the $5 profit. Without the "step up", the original cost of $5 for the stock would transfer to your son (called a "carry-over basis"), so when he sold the stock at $80, he would now have to pay capital gains tax on $75 profit. Now if you apply that same principal to something larger, like a home purchased for $50k in 1970 and is valued at $750k today, it is clear how much of a tax burden this will place on your son. This is also why gifting an asset versus allowing it to pass through inheritance is not always the best option.

There are many possible solutions being proposed in congress right now. Something may be passed by the end of the year, something may happen later and be applied retroactively, it is definately an area to be aware of and if you haven't developed your estate plan, yet, it is definately a time to get things done and protect your estate not only from probate, but also to attempt to minimize the tax burdens on your heirs while we still have the ability to do so.

Disclaimer: The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.


Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication, including attachments, was not written to be used and cannot be used for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein. If you would like a written opinion upon which you can rely for the purposes of avoiding penalties, please contact us.